The biomechanical performance of a new forked knotless biceps tenodesis compared to a knotless and s...
The biomechanical performance of a new forked knotless biceps tenodesis compared to a knotless and suture anchor tenodesis
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
Purpose
Biomechanical comparison of three different fixation techniques for a proximal biceps tenodesis.
Methods
Eighteen human cadaver specimens were used for the testing. A tenodesis of the proximal biceps tendon was performed using a double-loaded suture anchor (5.5-mm Corkscrew, Arthrex), a knotless anchor (5.5-mm SwiveLock, Arthrex) o...
Alternative Titles
Full title
The biomechanical performance of a new forked knotless biceps tenodesis compared to a knotless and suture anchor tenodesis
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Author / Creator
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808736111
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808736111
Other Identifiers
ISSN
0942-2056
E-ISSN
1433-7347
DOI
10.1007/s00167-014-3365-y