Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Patients Aged 16 Years and...
Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Patients Aged 16 Years and Older: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Comparison of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
Background:
There is no consensus on the choice of treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures (MCFs).
Purpose:
The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were (1) to compare fracture healing disorders and functional outcomes of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of MCFs and (2) to compare effect estimates obtained from randomize...
Alternative Titles
Full title
Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Midshaft Clavicle Fractures in Patients Aged 16 Years and Older: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Comparison of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1841800212
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1841800212
Other Identifiers
ISSN
0363-5465
E-ISSN
1552-3365
DOI
10.1177/0363546516673615
