Log in to save to my catalogue

Is ‘gut feeling’ by medical staff better than validated scores in estimation of mortality in a medic...

Is ‘gut feeling’ by medical staff better than validated scores in estimation of mortality in a medic...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1906144798

Is ‘gut feeling’ by medical staff better than validated scores in estimation of mortality in a medical intensive care unit? – The prospective FEELING-ON-ICU study

About this item

Full title

Is ‘gut feeling’ by medical staff better than validated scores in estimation of mortality in a medical intensive care unit? – The prospective FEELING-ON-ICU study

Publisher

United States: Elsevier Inc

Journal title

Journal of critical care, 2017-10, Vol.41, p.204-208

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

United States: Elsevier Inc

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Abstract Purpose The aim of the FEELING-ON-ICU study was to compare mortality estimations of critically ill patients based on ‘gut feeling’ of medical staff and by Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA). Materials and methods Medical staf...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Is ‘gut feeling’ by medical staff better than validated scores in estimation of mortality in a medical intensive care unit? – The prospective FEELING-ON-ICU study

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1906144798

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1906144798

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0883-9441

E-ISSN

1557-8615

DOI

10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.05.029

How to access this item