Log in to save to my catalogue

Analysis of intravaginal misoprostol 0.2 mg versus intracervical dinoprostone 0.5 mg doses for labor...

Analysis of intravaginal misoprostol 0.2 mg versus intracervical dinoprostone 0.5 mg doses for labor...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1921134116

Analysis of intravaginal misoprostol 0.2 mg versus intracervical dinoprostone 0.5 mg doses for labor induction at term pregnancies

About this item

Full title

Analysis of intravaginal misoprostol 0.2 mg versus intracervical dinoprostone 0.5 mg doses for labor induction at term pregnancies

Publisher

Poland: Wydawnictwo Via Medica

Journal title

Ginekologia polska, 2017-01, Vol.88 (6), p.320-324

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

Poland: Wydawnictwo Via Medica

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Labor-induction methods are used in about 23% of labors. Most commonly, pharmacological methods are used to pre-induct the labor with dinoprostone - a PGE2 analog, and misoprostol - a PGE1 analog. The aim of this study was to evaluate two pharmacological methods of labor induction with the use of prostaglandins applied via an intravagi-nal insert c...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Analysis of intravaginal misoprostol 0.2 mg versus intracervical dinoprostone 0.5 mg doses for labor induction at term pregnancies

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1921134116

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1921134116

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0017-0011

E-ISSN

2543-6767

DOI

10.5603/GP.a2017.0060

How to access this item