Log in to save to my catalogue

Comparison of Pipeline Embolization Device and Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device Flow Diverters f...

Comparison of Pipeline Embolization Device and Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device Flow Diverters f...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2155926037

Comparison of Pipeline Embolization Device and Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device Flow Diverters for Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

About this item

Full title

Comparison of Pipeline Embolization Device and Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device Flow Diverters for Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

Publisher

United States: Copyright by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons

Journal title

Neurosurgery, 2019-08, Vol.85 (2), p.E249-E255

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

United States: Copyright by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Flow diversion has become an accepted endovascular treatment modality for intracranial aneurysms. Studies comparing different types of flow diverters are currently lacking.
To perform a propensity score-matched cohort study comparing the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED; Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) and Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED;...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Comparison of Pipeline Embolization Device and Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device Flow Diverters for Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2155926037

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2155926037

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0148-396X

E-ISSN

1524-4040

DOI

10.1093/neuros/nyy572

How to access this item