Comparison between treatment of “established” versus complex “off-label” coronary lesions with Absor...
Comparison between treatment of “established” versus complex “off-label” coronary lesions with Absorb® bioresorbable scaffold implantation: results from the GABI-R® registry
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Huseynov, Aydin , Baumann, Stefan , Nef, Holger , Riemer, Thomas , Schneider, Steffen , Pfannenbecker, Thomas , Achenbach, Stephan , Mehilli, Julinda , Münzel, Thomas , Gori, Tommaso , Wöhrle, Jochen , Zahn, Ralf , Kastner, Johannes , Schmermund, Axel , Richardt, Gert , Hamm, Christian W. and Akin, Ibrahim
Publisher
Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients treated with bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) for off-label versus approved indications.
Background
The BRS promised some advantages in terms of complete biodegradation within 2–4 years, restored vascular physiology, and absence of potential stent-related lon...
Alternative Titles
Full title
Comparison between treatment of “established” versus complex “off-label” coronary lesions with Absorb® bioresorbable scaffold implantation: results from the GABI-R® registry
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2250626075
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2250626075
Other Identifiers
ISSN
1861-0684
E-ISSN
1861-0692
DOI
10.1007/s00392-019-01517-8
