Log in to save to my catalogue

A retrospective observational study of glucosamine sulfate in addition to conventional therapy in ha...

A retrospective observational study of glucosamine sulfate in addition to conventional therapy in ha...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2336984729

A retrospective observational study of glucosamine sulfate in addition to conventional therapy in hand osteoarthritis patients compared to conventional treatment alone

About this item

Full title

A retrospective observational study of glucosamine sulfate in addition to conventional therapy in hand osteoarthritis patients compared to conventional treatment alone

Publisher

Cham: Springer International Publishing

Journal title

Aging clinical and experimental research, 2020-06, Vol.32 (6), p.1161-1172

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

Cham: Springer International Publishing

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Background
The optimal management of hand osteoarthritis (HOA) is still challenging.
Aim
To evaluate the effects of glucosamine sulfate (GS) in addition to conventional therapy compared to conventional therapy alone in HOA.
Methods
This 6-month retrospective study included 108 patients with concomitant knee and hand OA. Fifty-five patients (GS Group) were treated for six consecutive months with crystalline GS (1500 mg once/day) in addition to conventional therapy for HOA [exercise combined with acetaminophen and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)] and 53 patients (Control Group) with the conventional therapy alone. Primary outcomes were the difference between groups in the change of hand pain on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and in the Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA) from baseline to 6 months. Secondary outcomes were Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), medical outcomes study 36-item short form (SF-36) and symptomatic drug consumption.
Results
The patients who received GS presented a significant decrease (
p
 < 0.001) in VAS pain and FIHOA scores compared with the Control Group at 3 and 6 months. Furthermore, GS therapy was associated to a significant improvement of HAQ score and to a significant reduction of acetaminophen and NSAID consumption during the follow-up. No differences in the number of side effects were observed between the groups.
Discussion
GS could represent a potential successful therapy for HOA and should be tried in large randomized placebo and active controlled trials.
Conclusions
The combination of GS with conventional treatment seems to be more effective in improving pain and function than conventional HOA treatment alone.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov,
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov
date of registration: April 9, 2019, NCT03911570. The present trial was retrospectively registered....

Alternative Titles

Full title

A retrospective observational study of glucosamine sulfate in addition to conventional therapy in hand osteoarthritis patients compared to conventional treatment alone

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2336984729

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2336984729

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1720-8319,1594-0667

E-ISSN

1720-8319

DOI

10.1007/s40520-019-01305-4

How to access this item