Comparing Outcomes Between Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Classical Low-Flow...
Comparing Outcomes Between Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Classical Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
United States: Elsevier Inc
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
United States: Elsevier Inc
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
Patients with classic low-flow low-gradient (cLFLG) aortic stenosis (AS) have a poor prognosis but still benefit from aortic valve replacement. There is a paucity of evidence to guide the choice between transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). This study compared procedural and midterm outcomes in...
Alternative Titles
Full title
Comparing Outcomes Between Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Classical Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2780488080
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2780488080
Other Identifiers
ISSN
0002-9149
E-ISSN
1879-1913
DOI
10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.01.020
