Log in to save to my catalogue

Estimates for diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 in systematic reviews are co...

Estimates for diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 in systematic reviews are co...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3112526423

Estimates for diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 in systematic reviews are consistently similar despite poor methodological rigor: a methodological overview

About this item

Full title

Estimates for diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 in systematic reviews are consistently similar despite poor methodological rigor: a methodological overview

Publisher

United States: Elsevier Inc

Journal title

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2024-12, Vol.176, p.111547-111547, Article 111547

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

United States: Elsevier Inc

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

AbstractObjectivesTo evaluate the design, conduct, and analysis of systematic reviews on the diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Study Design and SettingWe did a methodological overview of systematic reviews on diagnostic test accuracy, exploring methodological rigor, risk of bias and potential fa...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Estimates for diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 in systematic reviews are consistently similar despite poor methodological rigor: a methodological overview

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3112526423

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3112526423

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0895-4356,1878-5921

E-ISSN

1878-5921

DOI

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111547

How to access this item