Microwave, Irrigated, Pulsed, or Conventional Radiofrequency Energy Source: Which Energy Source for...
Microwave, Irrigated, Pulsed, or Conventional Radiofrequency Energy Source: Which Energy Source for Which Catheter Ablation?
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148-5018 , USA: Blackwell Futura Publishing, Inc
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148-5018 , USA: Blackwell Futura Publishing, Inc
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
ERDOGAN, A., et al.: Microwave, Irrigated, Pulsed, or Conventional Radiofrequency Energy Source: Which Energy Source for Which Catheter Ablation?
The aim of the study was to compare the diameter of endomyocardial lesions induced with the delivery of microwave, cooled, or pulsed energy versus conventional RF energy. In vitro tests were performed...
Alternative Titles
Full title
Microwave, Irrigated, Pulsed, or Conventional Radiofrequency Energy Source: Which Energy Source for Which Catheter Ablation?
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Author / Creator
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73179941
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73179941
Other Identifiers
ISSN
0147-8389
E-ISSN
1540-8159
DOI
10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00082.x
