Log in to save to my catalogue

Clinical Comparison of Acute Single to Dual Chamber Pacing in Chronotropically Incompetent Patients...

Clinical Comparison of Acute Single to Dual Chamber Pacing in Chronotropically Incompetent Patients...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77310199

Clinical Comparison of Acute Single to Dual Chamber Pacing in Chronotropically Incompetent Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction

About this item

Full title

Clinical Comparison of Acute Single to Dual Chamber Pacing in Chronotropically Incompetent Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Publisher

Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Journal title

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 1995-03, Vol.18 (3), p.433-440

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Dual chamber, rate responsive (DDDR) pacing is felt to be superior to ventricular, rate responsive (VVIR) pacing since it more closely mimics the normal electrical and hemodynamic activity of the heart. This reasoning has been used to justify the higher initial costs and increased complexity of dual chamber systems. This study was designed to deter...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Clinical Comparison of Acute Single to Dual Chamber Pacing in Chronotropically Incompetent Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77310199

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_77310199

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0147-8389

E-ISSN

1540-8159

DOI

10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb02542.x

How to access this item