Log in to save to my catalogue

A comparison of the performance of bacterial biofilters and fungal–bacterial coupled biofilters in B...

A comparison of the performance of bacterial biofilters and fungal–bacterial coupled biofilters in B...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_38903883

A comparison of the performance of bacterial biofilters and fungal–bacterial coupled biofilters in BTE p -X removal

About this item

Full title

A comparison of the performance of bacterial biofilters and fungal–bacterial coupled biofilters in BTE p -X removal

Publisher

United States

Journal title

PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2024-06, Vol.12, p.e17452, Article e17452

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

United States

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Conventional biofilters, which rely on bacterial activity, face challenges in eliminating hydrophobic compounds, such as aromatic compounds. This is due to the low solubility of these compounds in water, which makes them difficult to absorb by bacterial biofilms. Furthermore, biofilter operational stability is often hampered by acidification and dr...

Alternative Titles

Full title

A comparison of the performance of bacterial biofilters and fungal–bacterial coupled biofilters in BTE p -X removal

Authors, Artists and Contributors

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_38903883

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmed_primary_38903883

Other Identifiers

ISSN

2167-8359

E-ISSN

2167-8359

DOI

10.7717/peerj.17452

How to access this item