Log in to save to my catalogue

Effects of robotic-assisted early mobilization versus conventional mobilization in intensive care un...

Effects of robotic-assisted early mobilization versus conventional mobilization in intensive care un...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10999075

Effects of robotic-assisted early mobilization versus conventional mobilization in intensive care unit patients: prospective interventional cohort study with retrospective control group analysis

About this item

Full title

Effects of robotic-assisted early mobilization versus conventional mobilization in intensive care unit patients: prospective interventional cohort study with retrospective control group analysis

Publisher

England: BioMed Central Ltd

Journal title

Critical care (London, England), 2024-04, Vol.28 (1), p.112-112, Article 112

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

England: BioMed Central Ltd

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Approximately one in three survivors of critical illness suffers from intensive-care-unit-acquired weakness, which increases mortality and impairs quality of life. By counteracting immobilization, a known risk factor, active mobilization may mitigate its negative effects on patients. In this single-center trial, the effect of robotic-assisted early...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Effects of robotic-assisted early mobilization versus conventional mobilization in intensive care unit patients: prospective interventional cohort study with retrospective control group analysis

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10999075

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10999075

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1364-8535

E-ISSN

1364-8535,1466-609X,1366-609X

DOI

10.1186/s13054-024-04896-1

How to access this item