Patient Impression of Improvement 1 year After Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy...
Patient Impression of Improvement 1 year After Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage 2 or Higher
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
Cham: Springer International Publishing
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
Cham: Springer International Publishing
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
Introduction and hypothesis
Patient-reported outcomes are relevant outcomes in studies on pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery, as anatomical recurrence alone does not have a significant correlation with perceived improvement. In the present study, the patient’s impression of improvement after 1 year is studied after vaginal hysterectomy (VH) ver...
Alternative Titles
Full title
Patient Impression of Improvement 1 year After Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy in Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage 2 or Higher
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11150182
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11150182
Other Identifiers
ISSN
0937-3462,1433-3023
E-ISSN
1433-3023
DOI
10.1007/s00192-024-05750-2