Log in to save to my catalogue

Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test proto...

Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test proto...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4857736

Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients

About this item

Full title

Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients

Publisher

London: Nature Publishing Group UK

Journal title

Scientific reports, 2016-05, Vol.6 (1), p.25563-25563, Article 25563

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

London: Nature Publishing Group UK

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

This prospective randomized study compared test results of size modulation standard automated perimetry (SM-SAP) performed with the Octopus 600 and conventional SAP (C-SAP) performed with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) in glaucoma patients. Eighty-eight eyes of 88 glaucoma patients underwent SM-SAP and C-SAP tests with the Octopus 600 24-2 Dynam...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4857736

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4857736

Other Identifiers

ISSN

2045-2322

E-ISSN

2045-2322

DOI

10.1038/srep25563

How to access this item