Log in to save to my catalogue

Bonus-freeze: benefit or risk? Two-year outcome and procedural comparison of a “bonus-freeze” and “n...

Bonus-freeze: benefit or risk? Two-year outcome and procedural comparison of a “bonus-freeze” and “n...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4989001

Bonus-freeze: benefit or risk? Two-year outcome and procedural comparison of a “bonus-freeze” and “no bonus-freeze” protocol using the second-generation cryoballoon for pulmonary vein isolation

About this item

Full title

Bonus-freeze: benefit or risk? Two-year outcome and procedural comparison of a “bonus-freeze” and “no bonus-freeze” protocol using the second-generation cryoballoon for pulmonary vein isolation

Publisher

Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Journal title

Clinical research in cardiology, 2016-09, Vol.105 (9), p.774-782

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Background
Second-generation cryoballoon based pulmonary vein isolation has demonstrated encouraging acute and mid-term clinical outcome. Customarily, a bonus-freeze is applied after successful pulmonary vein isolation.
Objective
To compare the long-term clinical outcome and safety profile of a bonus-freeze and a no bonus-freeze protocol.<...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Bonus-freeze: benefit or risk? Two-year outcome and procedural comparison of a “bonus-freeze” and “no bonus-freeze” protocol using the second-generation cryoballoon for pulmonary vein isolation

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4989001

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4989001

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1861-0684

E-ISSN

1861-0692

DOI

10.1007/s00392-016-0987-8

How to access this item