External validation and comparison of three prediction tools for risk of osteoporotic fractures usin...
External validation and comparison of three prediction tools for risk of osteoporotic fractures using data from population based electronic health records: retrospective cohort study
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
Objective To directly compare the performance and externally validate the three most studied prediction tools for osteoporotic fractures—QFracture, FRAX, and Garvan—using data from electronic health records.Design Retrospective cohort study.Setting Payer provider healthcare organisation in Israel.Participants 1 054 815 members aged 50 to 90 years f...
Alternative Titles
Full title
External validation and comparison of three prediction tools for risk of osteoporotic fractures using data from population based electronic health records: retrospective cohort study
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Author / Creator
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5244817
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5244817
Other Identifiers
ISSN
0959-8138
E-ISSN
1756-1833
DOI
10.1136/bmj.i6755
