Comparative clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of endovascular strategy v open repair for...
Comparative clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of endovascular strategy v open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: three year results of the IMPROVE randomised trial
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
Objective To assess the three year clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness of a strategy of endovascular repair (if aortic morphology is suitable, open repair if not) versus open repair for patients with suspected ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.Design Randomised controlled trial.Setting 30 vascular centres (29 in UK, one in Canada), 2009-16.Pa...
Alternative Titles
Full title
Comparative clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of endovascular strategy v open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: three year results of the IMPROVE randomised trial
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Author / Creator
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5682594
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5682594
Other Identifiers
ISSN
0959-8138
E-ISSN
1756-1833
DOI
10.1136/bmj.j4859
