Log in to save to my catalogue

Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women w...

Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women w...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6734519

Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial

About this item

Full title

Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial

Publisher

England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD

Journal title

BMJ (Online), 2019-09, Vol.366, p.l5149-l5149

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and success of uterus preserving sacrospinous hysteropexy as an alternative to vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse five years after surgery.DesignObservational follow-up of SAVE U (sacrospinous fixation versus vaginal hysterectomy in t...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6734519

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6734519

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0959-8138

E-ISSN

1756-1833

DOI

10.1136/bmj.l5149

How to access this item