Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women w...
Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and success of uterus preserving sacrospinous hysteropexy as an alternative to vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse five years after surgery.DesignObservational follow-up of SAVE U (sacrospinous fixation versus vaginal hysterectomy in t...
Alternative Titles
Full title
Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6734519
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6734519
Other Identifiers
ISSN
0959-8138
E-ISSN
1756-1833
DOI
10.1136/bmj.l5149