Comparison of ablation outcomes of the second ablation procedure for recurrent atrial fibrillation u...
Comparison of ablation outcomes of the second ablation procedure for recurrent atrial fibrillation using an ultra‐high‐resolution mapping system and conventional mappings system
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
New York: Wiley Periodicals, Inc
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
New York: Wiley Periodicals, Inc
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
Background
The utility of an ultra‐high‐resolution electroanatomical mapping system (UHR‐EAM, Rhythmia) for repeat atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has not been evaluated.
Hypothesis
A second AF ablation procedure performed using UHR‐EAM may demonstrate different outcomes compared with that using a conventional electroanatomical mapping s...
Alternative Titles
Full title
Comparison of ablation outcomes of the second ablation procedure for recurrent atrial fibrillation using an ultra‐high‐resolution mapping system and conventional mappings system
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6788574
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6788574
Other Identifiers
ISSN
0160-9289
E-ISSN
1932-8737
DOI
10.1002/clc.23248
