Log in to save to my catalogue

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus endometrial ablation for women with heavy menstrual b...

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus endometrial ablation for women with heavy menstrual b...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6891255

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus endometrial ablation for women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HEALTH): a parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial

About this item

Full title

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus endometrial ablation for women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HEALTH): a parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial

Publisher

England: Elsevier Ltd

Journal title

The Lancet (British edition), 2019-10, Vol.394 (10207), p.1425-1436

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

England: Elsevier Ltd

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Heavy menstrual bleeding affects 25% of women in the UK, many of whom require surgery to treat it. Hysterectomy is effective but has more complications than endometrial ablation, which is less invasive but ultimately leads to hysterectomy in 20% of women. We compared laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with endometrial ablation in women seeking...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus endometrial ablation for women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HEALTH): a parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6891255

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6891255

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0140-6736,1474-547X

E-ISSN

1474-547X

DOI

10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31790-8

How to access this item