Log in to save to my catalogue

Diagnostic accuracy of “sweeping” method compared to conventional sampling in rapid urease test for...

Diagnostic accuracy of “sweeping” method compared to conventional sampling in rapid urease test for...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7595103

Diagnostic accuracy of “sweeping” method compared to conventional sampling in rapid urease test for Helicobacter pylori detection in atrophic mucosa

About this item

Full title

Diagnostic accuracy of “sweeping” method compared to conventional sampling in rapid urease test for Helicobacter pylori detection in atrophic mucosa

Publisher

London: Nature Publishing Group UK

Journal title

Scientific reports, 2020-10, Vol.10 (1), p.18483, Article 18483

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

London: Nature Publishing Group UK

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Although the rapid urease test (RUT) is a simple method for detecting
Helicobacter pylori
(
H. pylori
) infection, it requires sufficient biopsy samples and its sensitivity varies depending on the site and condition of
H. pylori
infection. We compared the diagnostic performance of a “sweeping method” for
H. pylori
detection...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Diagnostic accuracy of “sweeping” method compared to conventional sampling in rapid urease test for Helicobacter pylori detection in atrophic mucosa

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7595103

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7595103

Other Identifiers

ISSN

2045-2322

E-ISSN

2045-2322

DOI

10.1038/s41598-020-75528-1

How to access this item