Log in to save to my catalogue

Spatial Heterogeneity in Positional Errors: A Comparison of Two Residential Geocoding Efforts in the...

Spatial Heterogeneity in Positional Errors: A Comparison of Two Residential Geocoding Efforts in the...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7915413

Spatial Heterogeneity in Positional Errors: A Comparison of Two Residential Geocoding Efforts in the Agricultural Health Study

About this item

Full title

Spatial Heterogeneity in Positional Errors: A Comparison of Two Residential Geocoding Efforts in the Agricultural Health Study

Publisher

Switzerland: MDPI AG

Journal title

International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-02, Vol.18 (4), p.1637

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

Switzerland: MDPI AG

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Geocoding is a powerful tool for environmental exposure assessments that rely on spatial databases. Geocoding processes, locators, and reference datasets have improved over time; however, improvements have not been well-characterized. Enrollment addresses for the Agricultural Health Study, a cohort of pesticide applicators and their spouses in Iowa...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Spatial Heterogeneity in Positional Errors: A Comparison of Two Residential Geocoding Efforts in the Agricultural Health Study

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7915413

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7915413

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1660-4601,1661-7827

E-ISSN

1660-4601

DOI

10.3390/ijerph18041637

How to access this item