Log in to save to my catalogue

Differences Between a Single- and a Double-Folding Nucleus-9Be Optical Potential

Differences Between a Single- and a Double-Folding Nucleus-9Be Optical Potential

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_springer_journals_10_1007_s00601_016_1082_4

Differences Between a Single- and a Double-Folding Nucleus-9Be Optical Potential

About this item

Full title

Differences Between a Single- and a Double-Folding Nucleus-9Be Optical Potential

Publisher

Vienna: Springer Vienna

Journal title

Few-body systems, 2016-05, Vol.57 (5), p.331-336

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

Vienna: Springer Vienna

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

We have recently constructed two very successful
n
-
9
Be optical potentials (Bonaccorso and Charity in Phys Rev C89:024619,
2014
). One by the Dispersive Optical Model (DOM) method and the other (AB) fully phenomenological. The two potentials have strong surface terms in common for both the real and the imaginary parts. This feature makes them particularly suitable to build a single-folded (light-) nucleus-
9
Be optical potential by using ab-initio projectile densities such as those obtained with the VMC method (Wiringa
http://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/research/density/
). On the other hand, a VMC density together with experimental nucleon–nucleon cross-sections can be used also to obtain a neutron and/or proton-
9
Be imaginary folding potential. We will use here an ab-initio VMC density (Wiringa
http://www.phy.anl.gov/theor...

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_springer_journals_10_1007_s00601_016_1082_4

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_springer_journals_10_1007_s00601_016_1082_4

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0177-7963

E-ISSN

1432-5411

DOI

10.1007/s00601-016-1082-4

How to access this item