Log in to save to my catalogue

A Roman “implant” reconsidered: Reply

A Roman “implant” reconsidered: Reply

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_springer_journals_10_1038_28982

A Roman “implant” reconsidered: Reply

About this item

Full title

A Roman “implant” reconsidered: Reply

Publisher

London: Nature Publishing Group UK

Journal title

Nature (London), 1998-08, Vol.394 (6693), p.534-534

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

London: Nature Publishing Group UK

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Crubézy
et al.
reply
— We disagree with
Becker's
view that the dental implant described in our earlier
Scientific Correspondence
1
is a natural canine stained with iron oxides. The dental implant was located in a position normally taken by the upper second right premolar, a position in which a normal canine would not be foun...

Alternative Titles

Full title

A Roman “implant” reconsidered: Reply

Authors, Artists and Contributors

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_springer_journals_10_1038_28982

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_springer_journals_10_1038_28982

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0028-0836

E-ISSN

1476-4687

DOI

10.1038/28982

How to access this item