Comparison of duplicate portion and 24 h recall as reference methods for validating a FFQ using urin...
Comparison of duplicate portion and 24 h recall as reference methods for validating a FFQ using urinary markers as the estimate of true intake
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
As FFQ are subject to measurement error, associations between self-reported intake by FFQ and outcome measures should be adjusted by correction factors obtained from a validation study. Whether the correction is adequate depends on the characteristics of the reference method used in the validation study. Preferably, reference methods should (1) be...
Alternative Titles
Full title
Comparison of duplicate portion and 24 h recall as reference methods for validating a FFQ using urinary markers as the estimate of true intake
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_wageningen_narcis_oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_492205
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_wageningen_narcis_oai_library_wur_nl_wurpubs_492205
Other Identifiers
ISSN
0007-1145
E-ISSN
1475-2662
DOI
10.1017/S0007114515002871
