Does optimizing Choose to Move - a health-promoting program for older adults - enhance scalability,...
Does optimizing Choose to Move - a health-promoting program for older adults - enhance scalability, program implementation and effectiveness?
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
England: BioMed Central Ltd
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
England: BioMed Central Ltd
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
Investment in scale-up and sustainment of effective health-promoting programs is often hampered by competing demands on scarce health dollars. Thus, optimizing programs to reduce resource use (e.g., delivery costs) while maintaining effectiveness is necessary to promote health at scale. Using a phased approach (2015-2024), we adapted and scaled-up an evidence-based, health-promoting program for older adults (Choose to Move; CTM). For CTM Phase 4 we undertook a systematic, data-driven adaptation process to reduce resource use. In this paper we: 1) describe the CTM Phase 4 program ('CTM Phase 4') and assess its 2) implementation and 3) effectiveness.
For CTM Phase 4 (30-min one-on-one consultation and 8, 60-min group meetings with an activity coach), we reduced activity coach hours by 40% compared to Phase 3. To evaluate effectiveness of CTM Phase 4 we conducted a type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study involving 137 programs (1126 older adults; 59-74 years, 75 + years) delivered by 29 activity coaches. We assessed implementation indicators (e.g., dose, fidelity, adaptation, participant responsiveness, self-efficacy) via survey in activity coaches and older adults. We assessed older adults' physical activity (PA), mobility, social isolation, and loneliness before and after (0, 3 months) the program.
Implementation indicators demonstrated that CTM Phase 4 was delivered successfully. Post-intervention, PA (+ 1.4 days/week; 95% CI 1.3, 1.6), mobility limitations (-6.4%), and scores for mobility (+ 0.7; 95% CI: 0.4, 1.3), social isolation (+ 0.9; 95% CI: 0.67, 1.17), and loneliness (-0.23; 95% CI: -0.34, -0.13) were improved in those < 75 years. Among those ≥ 75 years, PA (+ 1.0 days/week; 95% CI, 0.7, 1.2), mobility score (+ 1.1; 95% CI: 0.4, 1.8), and social isolation score (+ 0.5; 95% CI: 0.08, 0.86) were improved post-intervention. Participant-level benefits were comparable to, or greater (PA and social isolation in those < 75) than, those observed in Phase 3.
CTM was co-designed as a flexible program, adapted over time based on user group needs and preferences. This flexibility enabled us to reduce activity coach delivery hours without compromising implementation or benefits to older adults' health. Optimizing effective health-promoting programs to enhance their scalability and sustainability provides an important pathway to improved population health.
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05678985. Registered 10 January 2023 - Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05678985 ....
Alternative Titles
Full title
Does optimizing Choose to Move - a health-promoting program for older adults - enhance scalability, program implementation and effectiveness?
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4cf8b462aadd4a92a9b5fca8a99a0c5c
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4cf8b462aadd4a92a9b5fca8a99a0c5c
Other Identifiers
ISSN
1479-5868
E-ISSN
1479-5868
DOI
10.1186/s12966-024-01649-9