Unfinished debate: Why IPH-based metrics are still needed—An Editorial for “Signal intensity and vol...
Unfinished debate: Why IPH-based metrics are still needed—An Editorial for “Signal intensity and volume of carotid intraplaque hemorrhage on magnetic resonance imaging and the risk of ipsilateral cerebrovascular events: the Plaque At RISK (PARISK) study”
About this item
Full title
Unfinished debate: Why IPH-based metrics are still needed—An Editorial for “Signal intensity and volume of carotid intraplaque hemorrhage on magnetic resonance imaging and the risk of ipsilateral cerebrovascular events: the Plaque At RISK (PARISK) study”
Author / Creator
Publisher
England: Elsevier Inc
Journal title
Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance, 2024, Vol.26 (2), p.101071, Article 101071
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
England: Elsevier Inc
More information
Alternative Titles
Full title
Unfinished debate: Why IPH-based metrics are still needed—An Editorial for “Signal intensity and volume of carotid intraplaque hemorrhage on magnetic resonance imaging and the risk of ipsilateral cerebrovascular events: the Plaque At RISK (PARISK) study”
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Author / Creator
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_704b9ba203fa450bb43e5c3c3b988694
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_704b9ba203fa450bb43e5c3c3b988694
Other Identifiers
ISSN
1097-6647,1532-429X
E-ISSN
1532-429X
DOI
10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101071
