Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring (ClearSight™ system) during shoulder surgery in th...
Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring (ClearSight™ system) during shoulder surgery in the beach chair position: a prospective self-controlled study
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
England: BioMed Central Ltd
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
England: BioMed Central Ltd
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
The beach chair position that is commonly used in shoulder surgery is associated with relative hypovolemia, which leads to a reduction in arterial blood pressure. The effects of patient positioning on the accuracy of non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring with the ClearSight™ system (CS-BP; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine CA, USA) have not been studied extensively. Our research aim was to assess agreement levels between CS-BP measurements with traditional blood pressure monitoring techniques.
For this prospective self-controlled study, we included 20 consecutively treated adult patients undergoing elective shoulder surgery in the beach chair position. We performed Bland-Altman analyses to determine agreement levels between blood pressure values from CS-BP and standard non-invasive (NIBP) methods. Perioperative measurements were done in both the supine (as reference) and beach chair surgical positions. Additionally, we compared invasive blood pressure (IBP) measurements with both the non-invasive methods (CS-BP and NIBP) in a sub-group of patients (n = 10) who required arterial blood pressure monitoring.
We analyzed 229 data points (116 supine, 113 beach chair) from the entire cohort; per patient measurements were based on surgical length (range 3-9 supine, 2-10 beach chair). The mean difference (±SD; 95% limits of agreement) in the mean arterial pressure (MAP) between CS-BP and NIBP was - 0.9 (±11.0; - 24.0-22.2) in the beach chair position and - 4.9 mmHg (±11.8; - 28.0-18.2) when supine. In the sub-group, the difference between CS-BP and IBP in the beach chair position was - 1.6 mmHg (±16.0; - 32.9-29.7) and - 2.8 mmHg (±15.3; - 32.8-27.1) in the supine position. Between NIBP and IBP, we detected a difference of 3.0 mmHg (±9.1; - 20.8-14.7) in the beach chair position, and 4.6 mmHg (±13.3; - 21.4-30.6) in the supine position.
We found clinically acceptable mean differences in MAP measurements between the ClearSight™ and non-invasive oscillometric blood pressure systems when patients were in either the supine or beach chair position. For all comparisons of the monitoring systems and surgical positions, the standard deviations and limits of agreement were wide.
This study was prospectively registered at the German Clinical Trial Register (www.DRKS.de; DRKS00013773 ). Registered 26/01/2018....
Alternative Titles
Full title
Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring (ClearSight™ system) during shoulder surgery in the beach chair position: a prospective self-controlled study
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7c17ff0e8db14488990b874c48b295f5
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7c17ff0e8db14488990b874c48b295f5
Other Identifiers
ISSN
1471-2253
E-ISSN
1471-2253
DOI
10.1186/s12871-020-01185-6