Log in to save to my catalogue

Performance Comparison of Geoid Refinement between XGM2016 and EGM2008 Based on the KTH and RCR Meth...

Performance Comparison of Geoid Refinement between XGM2016 and EGM2008 Based on the KTH and RCR Meth...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9554947bc87d410787323ae20d31fe5f

Performance Comparison of Geoid Refinement between XGM2016 and EGM2008 Based on the KTH and RCR Methods: Jilin Province, China

About this item

Full title

Performance Comparison of Geoid Refinement between XGM2016 and EGM2008 Based on the KTH and RCR Methods: Jilin Province, China

Publisher

Basel: MDPI AG

Journal title

Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2020-01, Vol.12 (2), p.324

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

Basel: MDPI AG

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

The selection of an appropriate global gravity field model and refinement method can effectively improve the accuracy of the refined regional geoid model in a certain research area. We analyzed the accuracy of Experimental Geopotential Model (XGM2016) based on the GPS-leveling data and the modification parameters of the global mean square errors in...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Performance Comparison of Geoid Refinement between XGM2016 and EGM2008 Based on the KTH and RCR Methods: Jilin Province, China

Authors, Artists and Contributors

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9554947bc87d410787323ae20d31fe5f

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9554947bc87d410787323ae20d31fe5f

Other Identifiers

ISSN

2072-4292

E-ISSN

2072-4292

DOI

10.3390/rs12020324

How to access this item