Log in to save to my catalogue

Reconciling ACEA and MCDA: is there a way forward for measuring cost-effectiveness in the U.S. healt...

Reconciling ACEA and MCDA: is there a way forward for measuring cost-effectiveness in the U.S. healt...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a57cb9c619094f92912eb7a0cc057757

Reconciling ACEA and MCDA: is there a way forward for measuring cost-effectiveness in the U.S. healthcare setting?

About this item

Full title

Reconciling ACEA and MCDA: is there a way forward for measuring cost-effectiveness in the U.S. healthcare setting?

Publisher

England: BioMed Central Ltd

Journal title

Cost effectiveness and resource allocation, 2021-03, Vol.19 (1), p.13-13, Article 13

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

England: BioMed Central Ltd

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

The ISPOR Special Task Force (STF) on US Value Assessment Frameworks was agnostic about exactly how to implement the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) as a key element in an overall cost-effectiveness evaluation. But the STF recommended using the cost-per-QALY gained as a starting point in deliberations about including a new technology in a health...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Reconciling ACEA and MCDA: is there a way forward for measuring cost-effectiveness in the U.S. healthcare setting?

Authors, Artists and Contributors

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a57cb9c619094f92912eb7a0cc057757

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a57cb9c619094f92912eb7a0cc057757

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1478-7547

E-ISSN

1478-7547

DOI

10.1186/s12962-021-00266-8

How to access this item