Log in to save to my catalogue

Different interpretation of additional evidence for HTA by the commissioned HTA body and the commiss...

Different interpretation of additional evidence for HTA by the commissioned HTA body and the commiss...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c68516dbd41f4901820b6eee9f24e844

Different interpretation of additional evidence for HTA by the commissioned HTA body and the commissioning decision maker in Germany: Whenever IQWiG and Federal Joint Committee disagree

About this item

Full title

Different interpretation of additional evidence for HTA by the commissioned HTA body and the commissioning decision maker in Germany: Whenever IQWiG and Federal Joint Committee disagree

Publisher

Heidelberg: Springer

Journal title

Health Economics Review, 2019-12, Vol.9 (35), p.1-15, Article 35

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

Heidelberg: Springer

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Background: The purpose of this study was to analyse the impact of commissioned addenda by the Federal Joint Committee (FJC) to the HTA body (IQWiG) and their agreement with FJC decisions and to identify potential additional decisive factors of FJC. Methods: All available relevant documents up to end of 2017 were screened and essential content extr...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Different interpretation of additional evidence for HTA by the commissioned HTA body and the commissioning decision maker in Germany: Whenever IQWiG and Federal Joint Committee disagree

Authors, Artists and Contributors

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c68516dbd41f4901820b6eee9f24e844

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c68516dbd41f4901820b6eee9f24e844

Other Identifiers

ISSN

2191-1991

E-ISSN

2191-1991

DOI

10.1186/s13561-019-0254-6

How to access this item