Log in to save to my catalogue

Evaluating the Accuracy and Efficiency of Multiple Sequence Alignment Methods

Evaluating the Accuracy and Efficiency of Multiple Sequence Alignment Methods

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d4f70fbdfa9345179b0683c4e4fa8214

Evaluating the Accuracy and Efficiency of Multiple Sequence Alignment Methods

About this item

Full title

Evaluating the Accuracy and Efficiency of Multiple Sequence Alignment Methods

Publisher

London, England: Libertas Academica

Journal title

Evolutionary Bioinformatics, 2014-01, Vol.2014 (2014), p.205-217

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

London, England: Libertas Academica

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

A comparison of 10 most popular Multiple Sequence Alignment (MSA) tools, namely, MUSCLE, MAFFT(L-INS-i), MAFFT (FFT-NS-2), T-Coffee, ProbCons, SATe, Clustal Omega, Kalign, Multalin, and Dialign-TX is presented. We also focused on the significance of some implementations embedded in algorithm of each tool. Based on 10 simulated trees of different nu...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Evaluating the Accuracy and Efficiency of Multiple Sequence Alignment Methods

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d4f70fbdfa9345179b0683c4e4fa8214

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d4f70fbdfa9345179b0683c4e4fa8214

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1176-9343

E-ISSN

1176-9343

DOI

10.4137/EBO.S19199

How to access this item