Update of the risk assessment of nickel in food and drinking water
Update of the risk assessment of nickel in food and drinking water
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Schrenk, Dieter , Bignami, Margherita , Bodin, Laurent , Chipman, James Kevin , del Mazo, Jesús , Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina , Hogstrand, Christer , Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) , Leblanc, Jean‐Charles , Nebbia, Carlo Stefano , Ntzani, Evangelia , Petersen, Annette , Sand, Salomon , Schwerdtle, Tanja , Vleminckx, Christiane , Wallace, Heather , Guérin, Thierry , Massanyi, Peter , Van Loveren, Henk , Baert, Katleen , Gergelova, Petra , Nielsen, Elsa and EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM)
Publisher
Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
The European Commission asked EFSA to update its previous Opinion on nickel in food and drinking water, taking into account new occurrence data, the updated benchmark dose (BMD) Guidance and newly available scientific information. More than 47,000 analytical results on the occurrence of nickel were used for calculating chronic and acute dietary exposure. An increased incidence of post‐implantation loss in rats was identified as the critical effect for the risk characterisation of chronic oral exposure and a BMDL10 of 1.3 mg Ni/kg body weight (bw) per day was selected as the reference point for the establishment of a tolerable daily intake (TDI) of 13 μg/kg bw. Eczematous flare‐up reactions in the skin elicited in nickel‐sensitised humans, a condition known as systemic contact dermatitis, was identified as the critical effect for the risk characterisation of acute oral exposure. A BMDL could not be derived, and therefore, the lowest‐observed‐adverse‐effect‐level of 4.3 μg Ni/kg bw was selected as the reference point. The margin of exposure (MOE) approach was applied and an MOE of 30 or higher was considered as being indicative of a low health concern. The mean lower bound (LB)/upper bound (UB) chronic dietary exposure was below or at the level of the TDI. The 95th percentile LB/UB chronic dietary exposure was below the TDI in adolescents and in all adult age groups, but generally exceeded the TDI in toddlers and in other children, as well as in infants in some surveys. This may raise a health concern in these young age groups. The MOE values for the mean UB acute dietary exposure and for the 95th percentile UB raises a health concern for nickel‐sensitised individuals. The MOE values for an acute scenario regarding consumption of a glass of water on an empty stomach do not raise a health concern.
This publication is linked to the following EFSA Supporting Publications article: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2020.EN-1940/full...
Alternative Titles
Full title
Update of the risk assessment of nickel in food and drinking water
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Author / Creator
Bignami, Margherita
Bodin, Laurent
Chipman, James Kevin
del Mazo, Jesús
Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina
Hogstrand, Christer
Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron)
Leblanc, Jean‐Charles
Nebbia, Carlo Stefano
Ntzani, Evangelia
Petersen, Annette
Sand, Salomon
Schwerdtle, Tanja
Vleminckx, Christiane
Wallace, Heather
Guérin, Thierry
Massanyi, Peter
Van Loveren, Henk
Baert, Katleen
Gergelova, Petra
Nielsen, Elsa
EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM)
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e6de7508a4354f868709f09e4e7e5a58
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e6de7508a4354f868709f09e4e7e5a58
Other Identifiers
ISSN
1831-4732
E-ISSN
1831-4732
DOI
10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6268