Log in to save to my catalogue

Assessing reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in psychiatry: Adherence to CON...

Assessing reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in psychiatry: Adherence to CON...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_plos_journals_1961825645

Assessing reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in psychiatry: Adherence to CONSORT for abstracts: A systematic review

About this item

Full title

Assessing reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in psychiatry: Adherence to CONSORT for abstracts: A systematic review

Publisher

United States: Public Library of Science

Journal title

PloS one, 2017-11, Vol.12 (11), p.e0187807-e0187807

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

United States: Public Library of Science

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial (RCT) abstracts is important as readers often make their first judgments based on the abstracts. This study aims to assess the reporting quality of psychiatry RCT abstracts published before and after the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials for Abstracts (CONSORT-A) guidelines.
ME...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Assessing reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in psychiatry: Adherence to CONSORT for abstracts: A systematic review

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_plos_journals_1961825645

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_plos_journals_1961825645

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1932-6203

E-ISSN

1932-6203

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0187807

How to access this item