Log in to save to my catalogue

Self-selected interval judgments compared to point judgments: A weight judgment experiment in the pr...

Self-selected interval judgments compared to point judgments: A weight judgment experiment in the pr...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_plos_journals_2640116591

Self-selected interval judgments compared to point judgments: A weight judgment experiment in the presence of the size-weight illusion

About this item

Full title

Self-selected interval judgments compared to point judgments: A weight judgment experiment in the presence of the size-weight illusion

Publisher

United States: Public Library of Science

Journal title

PloS one, 2022-01, Vol.17 (3), p.e0264830-e0264830

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

United States: Public Library of Science

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Measurements of human attitudes and perceptions have traditionally used numerical point judgments. In the present study, we compared conventional point estimates of weight with an interval judgment method. Participants were allowed to make step by step judgments, successively converging towards their best estimate. Participants estimated, in grams,...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Self-selected interval judgments compared to point judgments: A weight judgment experiment in the presence of the size-weight illusion

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_plos_journals_2640116591

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_plos_journals_2640116591

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1932-6203

E-ISSN

1932-6203

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0264830