Log in to save to my catalogue

Superior reproducibility and repeatability in automated quantitative pupillometry compared to standa...

Superior reproducibility and repeatability in automated quantitative pupillometry compared to standa...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_plos_journals_2695866247

Superior reproducibility and repeatability in automated quantitative pupillometry compared to standard manual assessment, and quantitative pupillary response parameters present high reliability in critically ill cardiac patients

About this item

Full title

Superior reproducibility and repeatability in automated quantitative pupillometry compared to standard manual assessment, and quantitative pupillary response parameters present high reliability in critically ill cardiac patients

Publisher

San Francisco: Public Library of Science

Journal title

PloS one, 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0272303-e0272303

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

San Francisco: Public Library of Science

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Background Quantitative pupillometry is part of multimodal neuroprognostication of comatose patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, the reproducibility, repeatability, and reliability of quantitative pupillometry in this setting have not been investigated. Methods In a prospective blinded validation study, we compared manual...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Superior reproducibility and repeatability in automated quantitative pupillometry compared to standard manual assessment, and quantitative pupillary response parameters present high reliability in critically ill cardiac patients

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_plos_journals_2695866247

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_plos_journals_2695866247

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1932-6203

E-ISSN

1932-6203

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0272303

How to access this item