Log in to save to my catalogue

BLIND RULE-FOLLOWING AND THE 'ANTINOMY OF PURE REASON'

BLIND RULE-FOLLOWING AND THE 'ANTINOMY OF PURE REASON'

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1693206156

BLIND RULE-FOLLOWING AND THE 'ANTINOMY OF PURE REASON'

About this item

Full title

BLIND RULE-FOLLOWING AND THE 'ANTINOMY OF PURE REASON'

Author / Creator

Publisher

St. Andrews: Oxford University Press

Journal title

The Philosophical quarterly, 2015-07, Vol.65 (260), p.396-416

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

St. Andrews: Oxford University Press

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Saul Kripke identifies the 'rule-following problem' as finding an answer to the question: What makes it the case that a speaker means one thing rather than another by a linguistic expression? In a series of important papers in the 1980s and 1990s, Crispin Wright and Paul Boghossian argued that this problem could be neutralized via the adoption of a...

Alternative Titles

Full title

BLIND RULE-FOLLOWING AND THE 'ANTINOMY OF PURE REASON'

Authors, Artists and Contributors

Author / Creator

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1693206156

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1693206156

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0031-8094

E-ISSN

1467-9213

DOI

10.1093/pq/pqv023

How to access this item