LACE versus BEAM conditioning in relapsed and refractory lymphoma transplant: retrospective multicen...
LACE versus BEAM conditioning in relapsed and refractory lymphoma transplant: retrospective multicenter analysis of toxicity and efficacy
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
Tokyo: Springer Japan
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
Tokyo: Springer Japan
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
We compared the lomustine, cytarabine, cyclophosphamide and etoposide (LACE) and BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan (BEAM) conditioning regimens for toxicity, engraftment kinetics, and efficacy in 139 patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant for primary refractory or relapsed lymphoma. Ninety-two patients with Hodgkin l...
Alternative Titles
Full title
LACE versus BEAM conditioning in relapsed and refractory lymphoma transplant: retrospective multicenter analysis of toxicity and efficacy
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1771525518
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1771525518
Other Identifiers
ISSN
0925-5710
E-ISSN
1865-3774
DOI
10.1007/s12185-015-1927-5
