A comparison of DNA/RNA extraction protocols for high-throughput sequencing of microbial communities
A comparison of DNA/RNA extraction protocols for high-throughput sequencing of microbial communities
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Shaffer, Justin P , Marotz, Clarisse , Belda-Ferre, Pedro , Martino, Cameron , Wandro, Stephen , Estaki, Mehrbod , Salido, Rodolfo A , Carpenter, Carolina S , Zaramela, Livia S , Minich, Jeremiah J , Mackenzie, Bryant , Sanders, Karenina , Fraraccio, Serena , Ackermann, Gail , Humphrey, Gregory , Swafford, Austin D , Miller-Montgomery, Sandrine and Knight, Rob
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
Abstract One goal among microbial ecology researchers is to capture the maximum amount of information from all organisms in a sample. The recent COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the RNA virus SARS-CoV-2, has highlighted a gap in traditional DNA-based protocols, including the high-throughput methods we previously established as field standards. To enable simultaneous SARS-CoV-2 and microbial community profiling, we compare the relative performance of two total nucleic acid extraction protocols and our previously benchmarked protocol. We included a diverse panel of environmental and host-associated sample types, including body sites commonly swabbed for COVID-19 testing. Here we present results comparing the cost, processing time, DNA and RNA yield, microbial community composition, limit of detection, and well-to-well contamination, between these protocols. Accession numbers Raw sequence data were deposited at the European Nucleotide Archive (accession#: ERP124610) and raw and processed data are available at Qiita (Study ID: 12201). All processing and analysis code is available on GitHub (github.com/justinshaffer/Extraction_test_MagMAX). Methods summary To allow for downstream applications involving RNA-based organisms such as SARS-CoV-2, we compared the two extraction protocols designed to extract DNA and RNA against our previously established protocol for extracting only DNA for microbial community analyses. Across 10 diverse sample types, one of the two protocols was equivalent or better than our established DNA-based protocol. Our conclusion is based on per-sample comparisons of DNA and RNA yield, the number of quality sequences generated, microbial community alpha- and beta-diversity and taxonomic composition, the limit of detection, and extent of well-to-well contamination. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes * https://github.com/justinshaffer/Extraction_test_MagMAX...
Alternative Titles
Full title
A comparison of DNA/RNA extraction protocols for high-throughput sequencing of microbial communities
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Author / Creator
Marotz, Clarisse
Belda-Ferre, Pedro
Martino, Cameron
Wandro, Stephen
Estaki, Mehrbod
Salido, Rodolfo A
Carpenter, Carolina S
Zaramela, Livia S
Minich, Jeremiah J
Mackenzie, Bryant
Sanders, Karenina
Fraraccio, Serena
Ackermann, Gail
Humphrey, Gregory
Swafford, Austin D
Miller-Montgomery, Sandrine
Knight, Rob
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2507184867
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2507184867
Other Identifiers
E-ISSN
2692-8205
DOI
10.1101/2020.11.13.370387
How to access this item
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2507184867?pq-origsite=primo&accountid=13902