Log in to save to my catalogue

Ultrasound-Guided Needle Technique Accuracy: Prospective Comparison of Passive Magnetic Tracking Ver...

Ultrasound-Guided Needle Technique Accuracy: Prospective Comparison of Passive Magnetic Tracking Ver...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2553101297

Ultrasound-Guided Needle Technique Accuracy: Prospective Comparison of Passive Magnetic Tracking Versus Unassisted Echogenic Needle Localization

About this item

Full title

Ultrasound-Guided Needle Technique Accuracy: Prospective Comparison of Passive Magnetic Tracking Versus Unassisted Echogenic Needle Localization

Publisher

England: Copyright by American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

Journal title

Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2017-03, Vol.42 (2), p.223-232

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

England: Copyright by American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVESUltrasound-guided regional anesthesia facilitates an approach to sensitive targets such as nerve clusters without contact or inadvertent puncture. We compared accuracy of needle placement with a novel passive magnetic ultrasound needle guidance technology (NGT) versus conventional ultrasound (CU) with echogenic needles.
...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Ultrasound-Guided Needle Technique Accuracy: Prospective Comparison of Passive Magnetic Tracking Versus Unassisted Echogenic Needle Localization

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2553101297

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2553101297

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1098-7339

E-ISSN

1532-8651

DOI

10.1097/AAP.0000000000000549

How to access this item