Taking shortcuts: Great for travel, but not for reproducible methods sections
Taking shortcuts: Great for travel, but not for reproducible methods sections
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Standvoss, Kai , Kazezian, Vartan , Lewke, Britta R , Bastian, Kathleen , Chidambaram, Shambhavi , Arafat, Subhi , Alsharif, Ubai , Herrera-Melendez, Ana , Anna-Delia Knipper , Bruna Ms Seco , Nina Nitzan Soto , Rakitzis, Orestis , Isa Steinecker , Philipp Van Kronenberg Till , Zarebidaki, Fereshteh and Weissgerber, Tracey L
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
Methods sections are often missing critical details needed to reproduce an experiment. Methodological shortcut citations, in which authors cite previous papers instead of describing the method in detail, may contribute to this problem. This meta-research study used three approaches to systematically examine the use of shortcut citations in neuroscience, biology and psychiatry. First, we examined papers to determine why authors use citations in the methods section and to assess how often shortcut citations were used. Common reasons for using citations in the methods section included explaining how something was done by citing a previous resource that used the method (methodological shortcut citation), giving credit or specifying what was used (who or what citation), and providing context or a justification (why citation). Next, we reviewed 15 papers to determine what can happen when readers follow shortcut citations to find methodological details. While shortcut citations can be used effectively, problems encountered included difficulty identifying or accessing the cited materials, missing or insufficient descriptions of the cited method, and chains of shortcut citations. Third, we examined journal policies. Fewer than one quarter of journals had policies describing how authors should report methods that have been described previously or asking authors to explain modifications of previously described methods. We propose that methodological shortcut citations should meet three criteria; cited resources should describe a method very similar to the authors' method, provide enough detail to allow others to implement the method, and be open access. We outline actions that authors and journals can take to use shortcut citations responsibly, while fostering a culture of open and reproducible methods reporting. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes * https://osf.io/d2sa3/...
Alternative Titles
Full title
Taking shortcuts: Great for travel, but not for reproducible methods sections
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Author / Creator
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2700907605
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2700907605
Other Identifiers
E-ISSN
2692-8205
DOI
10.1101/2022.08.08.503174
How to access this item
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2700907605?pq-origsite=primo&accountid=13902