Log in to save to my catalogue

Taking shortcuts: Great for travel, but not for reproducible methods sections

Taking shortcuts: Great for travel, but not for reproducible methods sections

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2700907605

Taking shortcuts: Great for travel, but not for reproducible methods sections

About this item

Full title

Taking shortcuts: Great for travel, but not for reproducible methods sections

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

Journal title

bioRxiv, 2022-08

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

Subjects

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Methods sections are often missing critical details needed to reproduce an experiment. Methodological shortcut citations, in which authors cite previous papers instead of describing the method in detail, may contribute to this problem. This meta-research study used three approaches to systematically examine the use of shortcut citations in neuroscience, biology and psychiatry. First, we examined papers to determine why authors use citations in the methods section and to assess how often shortcut citations were used. Common reasons for using citations in the methods section included explaining how something was done by citing a previous resource that used the method (methodological shortcut citation), giving credit or specifying what was used (who or what citation), and providing context or a justification (why citation). Next, we reviewed 15 papers to determine what can happen when readers follow shortcut citations to find methodological details. While shortcut citations can be used effectively, problems encountered included difficulty identifying or accessing the cited materials, missing or insufficient descriptions of the cited method, and chains of shortcut citations. Third, we examined journal policies. Fewer than one quarter of journals had policies describing how authors should report methods that have been described previously or asking authors to explain modifications of previously described methods. We propose that methodological shortcut citations should meet three criteria; cited resources should describe a method very similar to the authors' method, provide enough detail to allow others to implement the method, and be open access. We outline actions that authors and journals can take to use shortcut citations responsibly, while fostering a culture of open and reproducible methods reporting. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes * https://osf.io/d2sa3/...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Taking shortcuts: Great for travel, but not for reproducible methods sections

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2700907605

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2700907605

Other Identifiers

E-ISSN

2692-8205

DOI

10.1101/2022.08.08.503174