Log in to save to my catalogue

Multivessel versus culprit lesion only percutaneous revascularization plus potential staged revascul...

Multivessel versus culprit lesion only percutaneous revascularization plus potential staged revascul...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1764340226

Multivessel versus culprit lesion only percutaneous revascularization plus potential staged revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Design and rationale of CULPRIT-SHOCK trial

About this item

Full title

Multivessel versus culprit lesion only percutaneous revascularization plus potential staged revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Design and rationale of CULPRIT-SHOCK trial

Publisher

United States: Elsevier Inc

Journal title

The American heart journal, 2016-02, Vol.172, p.160-169

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

United States: Elsevier Inc

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Background In acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS), up to 80% of patients present with multivessel coronary artery disease. Currently, the best revascularization strategy is unknown. Therefore, a prospective randomized adequately powered clinical trial is warranted. Study design The CULPRIT-SHOCK study is a 706-patient...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Multivessel versus culprit lesion only percutaneous revascularization plus potential staged revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Design and rationale of CULPRIT-SHOCK trial

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1764340226

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1764340226

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0002-8703

E-ISSN

1097-6744

DOI

10.1016/j.ahj.2015.11.006

How to access this item