Log in to save to my catalogue

Interpreting GRADE's levels of certainty or quality of the evidence: GRADE for statisticians, consid...

Interpreting GRADE's levels of certainty or quality of the evidence: GRADE for statisticians, consid...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808710302

Interpreting GRADE's levels of certainty or quality of the evidence: GRADE for statisticians, considering review information size or less emphasis on imprecision?

About this item

Full title

Interpreting GRADE's levels of certainty or quality of the evidence: GRADE for statisticians, considering review information size or less emphasis on imprecision?

Author / Creator

Publisher

United States: Elsevier Inc

Journal title

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2016-07, Vol.75, p.6-15

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

United States: Elsevier Inc

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Abstract This article responds to issues raised by Antilla et al. in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology about the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group's approach to rating imprecision and GRADE's use of statistics. They argue that GRADE confuses statistical terms and should provide a stepwise rat...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Interpreting GRADE's levels of certainty or quality of the evidence: GRADE for statisticians, considering review information size or less emphasis on imprecision?

Authors, Artists and Contributors

Author / Creator

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808710302

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808710302

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0895-4356

E-ISSN

1878-5921

DOI

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.018

How to access this item