Interpreting GRADE's levels of certainty or quality of the evidence: GRADE for statisticians, consid...
Interpreting GRADE's levels of certainty or quality of the evidence: GRADE for statisticians, considering review information size or less emphasis on imprecision?
About this item
Full title
Author / Creator
Publisher
United States: Elsevier Inc
Journal title
Language
English
Formats
Publication information
Publisher
United States: Elsevier Inc
Subjects
More information
Scope and Contents
Contents
Abstract This article responds to issues raised by Antilla et al. in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology about the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group's approach to rating imprecision and GRADE's use of statistics. They argue that GRADE confuses statistical terms and should provide a stepwise rat...
Alternative Titles
Full title
Interpreting GRADE's levels of certainty or quality of the evidence: GRADE for statisticians, considering review information size or less emphasis on imprecision?
Authors, Artists and Contributors
Author / Creator
Identifiers
Primary Identifiers
Record Identifier
TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808710302
Permalink
https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808710302
Other Identifiers
ISSN
0895-4356
E-ISSN
1878-5921
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.018