Log in to save to my catalogue

The Gold Standard Paradox in Digital Image Analysis: Manual Versus Automated Scoring as Ground Truth

The Gold Standard Paradox in Digital Image Analysis: Manual Versus Automated Scoring as Ground Truth

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1904204382

The Gold Standard Paradox in Digital Image Analysis: Manual Versus Automated Scoring as Ground Truth

About this item

Full title

The Gold Standard Paradox in Digital Image Analysis: Manual Versus Automated Scoring as Ground Truth

Publisher

United States: College of American Pathologists

Journal title

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976), 2017-09, Vol.141 (9), p.1267-1275

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

United States: College of American Pathologists

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

- Novel therapeutics often target complex cellular mechanisms. Increasingly, quantitative methods like digital tissue image analysis (tIA) are required to evaluate correspondingly complex biomarkers to elucidate subtle phenotypes that can inform treatment decisions with these targeted therapies. These tIA systems need a gold standard, or reference...

Alternative Titles

Full title

The Gold Standard Paradox in Digital Image Analysis: Manual Versus Automated Scoring as Ground Truth

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1904204382

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1904204382

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0003-9985,1543-2165

E-ISSN

1543-2165

DOI

10.5858/arpa.2016-0386-RA

How to access this item