Log in to save to my catalogue

Methodological quality was critically low in 9/10 systematic reviews in advanced cancer patients—A m...

Methodological quality was critically low in 9/10 systematic reviews in advanced cancer patients—A m...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2503448502

Methodological quality was critically low in 9/10 systematic reviews in advanced cancer patients—A methodological study

About this item

Full title

Methodological quality was critically low in 9/10 systematic reviews in advanced cancer patients—A methodological study

Publisher

United States: Elsevier Inc

Journal title

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2021-08, Vol.136, p.84-95

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

United States: Elsevier Inc

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

To assess the methodological quality and the consideration of heterogeneity in systematic reviews (SRs).
We conducted a methodological study (CRD42019134904) and searched three databases from January 2010 to July 2019. Interventional SRs with a statistically significant meta-analysis of at least four randomized controlled trials in advanced canc...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Methodological quality was critically low in 9/10 systematic reviews in advanced cancer patients—A methodological study

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2503448502

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2503448502

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0895-4356

E-ISSN

1878-5921

DOI

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.010

How to access this item