Log in to save to my catalogue

Comparison of Cap-Assisted vs Conventional Endoscopic Technique for Management of Food Bolus Impacti...

Comparison of Cap-Assisted vs Conventional Endoscopic Technique for Management of Food Bolus Impacti...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2575068432

Comparison of Cap-Assisted vs Conventional Endoscopic Technique for Management of Food Bolus Impaction in the Esophagus: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

About this item

Full title

Comparison of Cap-Assisted vs Conventional Endoscopic Technique for Management of Food Bolus Impaction in the Esophagus: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Publisher

United States: Wolters Kluwer

Journal title

The American journal of gastroenterology, 2021-11, Vol.116 (11), p.2235-2240

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

United States: Wolters Kluwer

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

"Push" or "pull" techniques with the use of snares, forceps, baskets, and grasping devices are conventionally used to manage esophageal food bolus impaction (FBI). A novel cap-assisted technique has recently been advocated to reduce time taken for food bolus (FB) removal. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the cap-assisted technique a...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Comparison of Cap-Assisted vs Conventional Endoscopic Technique for Management of Food Bolus Impaction in the Esophagus: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2575068432

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2575068432

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0002-9270

E-ISSN

1572-0241

DOI

10.14309/ajg.0000000000001484

How to access this item