Log in to save to my catalogue

Intermittent versus Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A matter of controversy

Intermittent versus Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A matter of controversy

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764377500

Intermittent versus Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A matter of controversy

About this item

Full title

Intermittent versus Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A matter of controversy

Publisher

Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd

Journal title

Intensive & critical care nursing, 2008-10, Vol.24 (5), p.269-285

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Acute Renal Failure (ARF) requiring some form of replacement therapy is a frequent complication in the critically ill patient. Despite potential therapeutic advantages the expectation of an improvement in patient outcomes using Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) compared to conventional Intermittent Haemodialysis (IHD) remains controversia...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Intermittent versus Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A matter of controversy

Authors, Artists and Contributors

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764377500

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_764377500

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0964-3397

E-ISSN

1532-4036

DOI

10.1016/j.iccn.2008.02.001

How to access this item