Log in to save to my catalogue

Artificial womb technology and the significance of birth: why gestatelings are not newborns (or fetu...

Artificial womb technology and the significance of birth: why gestatelings are not newborns (or fetu...

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6860405

Artificial womb technology and the significance of birth: why gestatelings are not newborns (or fetuses)

About this item

Full title

Artificial womb technology and the significance of birth: why gestatelings are not newborns (or fetuses)

Publisher

England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics

Journal title

Journal of medical ethics, 2019-11, Vol.45 (11), p.728-731

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

In a recent publication, I argued that there is a conceptual difference between artificial womb (AW) technology, capable of facilitating gestation ex utero, and neonatal intensive care, providing incubation to neonates born prematurely. One of the reasons I provided for this distinction was that the subjects of each process are different entities....

Alternative Titles

Full title

Artificial womb technology and the significance of birth: why gestatelings are not newborns (or fetuses)

Authors, Artists and Contributors

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6860405

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6860405

Other Identifiers

ISSN

0306-6800

E-ISSN

1473-4257

DOI

10.1136/medethics-2019-105723

How to access this item