Log in to save to my catalogue

Clinicians’ perspectives on quality: do they match accreditation standards?

Clinicians’ perspectives on quality: do they match accreditation standards?

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4539319c359b487d9e52a47877f2dd5a

Clinicians’ perspectives on quality: do they match accreditation standards?

About this item

Full title

Clinicians’ perspectives on quality: do they match accreditation standards?

Publisher

London: BioMed Central Ltd

Journal title

Human resources for health, 2021-06, Vol.19 (1), p.1-75, Article 75

Language

English

Formats

Publication information

Publisher

London: BioMed Central Ltd

More information

Scope and Contents

Contents

Quality of training is determined through programs' compliance with accreditation standards, often set for a number of years. However, perspectives on quality of training within these standards may differ from the clinicians' perspectives on quality of training. Knowledge on how standards relate to clinicians' perspectives on quality of training is...

Alternative Titles

Full title

Clinicians’ perspectives on quality: do they match accreditation standards?

Identifiers

Primary Identifiers

Record Identifier

TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4539319c359b487d9e52a47877f2dd5a

Permalink

https://devfeature-collection.sl.nsw.gov.au/record/TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4539319c359b487d9e52a47877f2dd5a

Other Identifiers

ISSN

1478-4491

E-ISSN

1478-4491

DOI

10.1186/s12960-021-00616-w

How to access this item